4.3 Article

Growth performance and carcass characteristics of feedlot Thai native x Lowline Angus crossbred steer fed with fermented cassava starch residue

Journal

TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages 719-726

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11250-016-1011-z

Keywords

Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Exogenous enzyme; Cassava starch residue; Growth performance; Carcass; Feedlot cattle

Funding

  1. Thailand Research Fund
  2. Office of the Higher Education Commission
  3. Ubon Ratchathani University, Thailand [MRG5680034]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ten Thai native x Lowline Angus crossbred (50:50) steers were used in a completely randomized design to receive two treatments including concentrate containing cassava chips (Control) and fermented cassava starch residue (FCSR) as major carbohydrate sources. FCSR was prepared as yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) inoculates with exogenous enzyme addition. All steers received ad libitum rice straw and concentrate in equal proportions (1:1). Replacement of cassava chip with FCSR increased neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber intakes but decreased non-protein nitrogen intake of steers. Digestibility of dry matter, organic matter, and crude protein were decreased with replacement of cassava chip by FCSR; however, digested nutrients were similar between groups. Replacement of cassava chip in the concentrate with FCSR resulted in comparable growth performance and feed efficiency of the feedlot steers. Moreover, carcass characteristics in terms of yield and meat quality of the steers were not affected by cassava chips replaced by FCSR as a major carbohydrate source in the concentrate. In conclusion, replacement of cassava chip in the concentrate with FCSR decreased feed digestibility; however, it did not impact negatively on growth performance and carcass traits of feedlot Thai native x Lowline Angus crossbred steers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available