Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey
Sarah L. Gorst et al.
PLOS ONE (2016)
Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain
Alessandro u Chiarotto et al.
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL (2015)
The Harmonizing Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) Roadmap: A Methodological Framework to Develop Core Sets of Outcome Measurements in Dermatology
Jochen Schmitt et al.
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY (2015)
Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0
Maarten Boers et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2014)
Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review
Elizabeth Gargon et al.
PLOS ONE (2014)
Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials ( COMET) initiative: protocol for an international Delphi study to achieve consensus on how to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a 'core outcome set'
Cecilia A. C. Prinsen et al.
TRIALS (2014)
Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider
Paula R. Williamson et al.
TRIALS (2012)
The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes
Lidwine B. Mokkink et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2010)
The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study
Lidwine B. Mokkink et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2010)
Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence
Iain Chalmers et al.
LANCET (2009)
Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires
Caroline B. Terwee et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2007)