4.7 Review

Rootstocks: Diversity, Domestication, and Impacts on Shoot Phenotypes

Journal

TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages 418-437

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.11.008

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden
  2. Florida International University (FIU) Dissertation Evidence Acquisition Fellowship
  3. NSF DDIG [1501326]
  4. NSF PGRP [1339346, IOS-1523668]
  5. Saint Louis University (SLU) Graduate Research Assistantship
  6. NSF Grape Research Coordination Network Graduate Research Award
  7. Missouri Grape and Wine Institute
  8. SLU Center for Sustainability and Presidential Research Fund
  9. Direct For Biological Sciences [1339346] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Direct For Biological Sciences
  11. Division Of Environmental Biology [1501326] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  12. Direct For Biological Sciences
  13. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [1523668] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  14. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [1339346] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Grafting is an ancient agricultural practice that joins the root system (rootstock) of one plant to the shoot (scion) of another. It is most commonly employed in woody perennial crops to indirectly manipulate scion phenotype. While recent research has focused on scions, here we investigate rootstocks, the lesser known half of the perennial crop equation. We review natural grafting, grafting in agriculture, rootstock diversity and domestication, and developing areas of rootstock research, including molecular interactions and rootstock micro-biomes. With growing interest in perennial crops as valuable components of sustainable agriculture, rootstocks provide one mechanism by which to improve and expand woody perennial cultivation in a range of environmental conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available