Journal
TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages 110-124Publisher
CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.10.015
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Iowa State University (ISU)
- Iowa Soybean Association
- ISU Plant Sciences Institute
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Advances in automated and high-throughput imaging technologies have resulted in a deluge of high-resolution images and sensor data of plants. However, extracting patterns and features from this large corpus of data requires the use of machine learning (ML) tools to enable data assimilation and feature identification for stress phenotyping. Four stages of the decision cycle in plant stress phenotyping and plant breeding activities where different ML approaches can be deployed are (i) identification, (ii) classification, (iii) quantification, and (iv) prediction (ICQP). We provide here a comprehensive overview and user-friendly taxonomy of ML tools to enable the plant community to correctly and easily apply the appropriate ML tools and best-practice guidelines for various biotic and abiotic stress traits.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available