4.7 Article

Prognostic and Chemotherapy Predictive Value of Gene-Expression Phenotypes in Primary Lung Adenocarcinoma

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 218-229

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0529

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Swedish Cancer Society
  2. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  3. Foundation for Strategic Research through the Lund Centre for Translational Cancer Research (CREATE Health)
  4. Mrs Berta Kamprad Foundation
  5. Gunnar Nilsson Cancer Foundation
  6. Swedish Research Council
  7. Gustav V:s Jubilee Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Primary lung adenocarcinoma remains a deadly disease. Gene-expression phenotypes (GEPs) in adenocarcinoma have potential to provide clinically relevant disease stratification for improved prognosis and treatment prediction, given appropriate clinical and methodologic validation. Experimental Design: 2,395 transcriptional adenocarcinoma profiles were assembled from 17 public cohorts and classified by a nearest centroid GEP classifier into three subtypes: terminal respiratory unit (TRU), proximal-proliferative, and proximal-inflammatory, and additionally scored by five transcriptional metagenes representing different biologic processes, including proliferation. Prognostic-and chemotherapy-predictive associations of the subtypes were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis using overall survival or distant metastasis-free survival as endpoints. Results: Overall, GEPs were associated with patient outcome in both univariate and multivariate analyses, although not in all individual cohorts. The prognostically relevant division was between TRU- and non-TRU-classified cases, with expression of proliferation-associated genes as a key prognostic component. In contrast, GEP classification was not predictive of adjuvant chemotherapy response. GEP classification showed stability to random perturbations of genes or samples and alterations to classification procedures (typically < 10% of cases/cohort switching subtype). High classification variability (> 20% of cases switching subtype) was observed when removing larger or entire fractions of a single subtype, due to gene-centering shifts not addressable by the classifier. Conclusions: In a large-scale evaluation, we show that GEPs add prognostic value to standard clinicopathologic variables in lung adenocarcinoma. Subject to classifier refinement and confirmation in prospective cohorts, GEPs have potential to affect the prognostication of adenocarcinoma patients through a molecularly driven disease stratification. (C) 2015 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available