4.1 Article

TRENDS IN ELEMENTAL CONCENTRATIONS OF TREE RINGS FROM THE SIBERIAN ARCTIC

Journal

TREE-RING RESEARCH
Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages 67-77

Publisher

TREE-RING SOC
DOI: 10.3959/1536-1098-72.02.67

Keywords

wood chemistry; dendrochemistry; Larix decidua; biogeochemical cycling; soil acidification; permafrost thawing; Arctic pollution; Norilsk Nickel smelting complex; ICP-MS

Categories

Funding

  1. U.S. Civilian Research & Development Foundation (CRDF) [RUG1-2950-KR-09]
  2. Russian Science Foundation (RSF) [14-14-00219]
  3. Russian Science Foundation [14-14-00219] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The biogeochemistry and ecology of the Arctic environment have been heavily impacted by anthropogenic pollution and climate change. We used ICP-MS to measure concentrations of 26 elements in the AD 1300-2000 tree rings of larch from the Taymyr Peninsula in northern Siberia for studying the interaction between environmental change and wood chemistry. We applied a two-stage data reduction technique to identify trends in the noisy measurement data. Statistical assessment of variance of normalized time series reveals pronounced depletion of xylem Ca, Mg, Cl, Bi and Si concentrations and enrichment of P, K, Mn, Rb, Sr and Ba concentrations after ca. AD 1900. The trends are unprecedented in the 700-year records, but multiple mechanisms may be at work and difficult to attribute with certainty. The declining xylem Ca and Mg may be a response to soil acidification from air pollution, whereas increasing P, K, and Mn concentrations may signal changes in root efficiency and excess water-soluble minerals liberated by the permafrost thaw. The changes seem consistent with mounting stress on Arctic vegetation. This study supports the potential of tree rings for monitoring past and ongoing changes in biogeochemistry of Arctic ecosystems related to pollution and permafrost thaw.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available