4.7 Article

Modeling the first train timetabling problem with minimal missed trains and synchronization time differences in subway networks

Journal

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL
Volume 93, Issue -, Pages 17-36

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2016.07.006

Keywords

First train timetabling; MIP model; Linearization; Heuristic; Case study

Funding

  1. China National Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists [71525002]
  2. NFSC [71473259, 71322102]
  3. Research Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Rail Traffic Control and Safety [RCS2016ZT001]
  4. Austrian Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Economy (BMWFW) within EURASIA PACIFIC UNINET scholarship framework

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Urban railway transportation organization is a systematic activity that is usually composed of several stages, including network design, line planning, timetabling, rolling stock and staffing. In this paper, we study the optimization of first train timetables for an urban railway network that focuses on designing convenient and smooth timetables for morning passengers. We propose a mixed integer programming (MIP) model for minimizing train arrival time differences and the number of missed trains, i.e., the number of trains without transfers within a reasonable time at interchange stations as an alternative to minimize passenger transfer waiting times. This is interesting from the operator's point of view, and we show that both criteria are equivalent. Starting from an intuitive model for the first train transfer problem, we then linearize the non-linear constraints by utilizing problem specific knowledge. In addition, a local search algorithm is developed to solve the timetabling problem. Through computational experiments involving the Beijing subway system, we demonstrate the computational efficiency of the exact model and the heuristic approach. Finally, three practical suggestions are proposed for the operation and management of the urban railway transit system. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available