4.2 Article

High background in Luminex® assay for HLA antibody screening: Interest of Adsorb Out™

Journal

TRANSPLANT IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 36, Issue -, Pages 20-24

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2016.03.001

Keywords

Luminex; HLA antibodies; High negative control bead value; Adsorb Out (TM)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: The Luminex (R) technology has become an integral component of clinical decision-making and diagnosis of transplanted organ rejection. Despite the superior sensibility of this technology, it is not completely problem free. We have observed in these bead-based assays that sera of some patients give a high negative control bead (NC) value which makes assessing HLA antibodies difficult. Treatment of sera by the Adsorb Out (TM) reagent may reduce the high background. In this study, we want to evaluate the effect of the Adsorb Out on the NC's MFI value by comparing treated and untreated patients' sera. Methods: HIA antibody screening was performed on 3011 sera. These sera came from patients awaiting and undergoing renal transplant from different Moroccan hospitals. The sera were analyzed using the standard protocol for Luminex (R) antibody screening. Sera with high NC's value has been pre-incubated by the Adsorb Out (TM), and analyzed on Luminex (R). Results: 3% of studied samples have high NC's value. The Adsorb Out decreases the NC's value and brings it back to a normal range in 62.2% treated sera. It has no effect in 12.3%. The Adsorb Out (TM) effect depends only of NC's value, independently to age, storage date, sex and immunization. Conclusion: The Adsorb Out (TM) reagent has an important effect in decreasing NC value of sera. However, it has no effect in some patient's sera. In these cases we could try another treatment, as EDTA, DTT. The non-specific binding may be caused by multiple patient-specific factors, it would be important to search correlation between them and NC's values. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available