4.0 Review

Enhancing the efficacy of engraftment of cord blood for hematopoietic cell transplantation

Journal

TRANSFUSION AND APHERESIS SCIENCE
Volume 54, Issue 3, Pages 364-372

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2016.05.013

Keywords

Cord blood; Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells; Cord blood collection; Oxygen tension; Dipeptidylpeptidase 4

Categories

Funding

  1. US Health Service National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01 HL056416, R01 HL067384, R01 HL112669]
  2. Center of Excellence in Molecular Hematology [P01 DK090948, U54 DK106846]
  3. NIH T32 grants [HL07910, DK07519]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clinical cord blood (CB) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has progressed well since the initial successful CB HCT that saved the life of a young boy with Fanconi anemia. The recipient is alive and well now 28 years out since that first transplant with CB cells from his HLA-matched sister. CB HCT has now been used to treat over 35,000 patients with various malignant and non-malignant disorders mainly using HLA-matched or partially HLA-disparate allogeneic CB cells. There are advantages and disadvantages to using CB for HCT compared to other sources of transplantable hematopoietic stem (HSC) and progenitor (HPC) cells. One disadvantage of the use of CB as a source of transplantable HSC and HPC is the limited number of these cells in a single CB collected, and slower time to neutrophil, platelet and immune cell recovery. This review describes current attempts to: increase the collection of HSC/HPC from CB, enhance the homing of the infused cells, ex-vivo expand numbers of collected HSC/HPC and increase production of the infused CB cells that reach the marrow. The ultimate goal is to manipulate efficiency and efficacy for safe and economical use of single unit CB HCT. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available