4.2 Article

International validation of a dithiothreitol (DTT)-based method to resolve the daratumumab interference with blood compatibility testing

Journal

TRANSFUSION
Volume 56, Issue 12, Pages 2964-2972

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/trf.13789

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Janssen, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUNDDaratumumab (DARA) consistently interferes with routine blood bank serologic testing by directly binding to CD38 expressed on reagent red blood cells (RBCs). Treating RBCs with dithiothreitol (DTT) eliminates the DARA interference. We conducted an international, multicenter, blinded study aimed at validating the DTT method for use by blood bank laboratories worldwide. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODSPaired plasma sample unknowns were sent to 25 participating blood bank laboratories. Sample 1 was spiked with DARA only (10 mu g/mL), and Sample 2 with DARA plus a clinically significant RBC antibody (anti-D [n=6], anti-Fy(a) [n=9], or anti-s [n=10]). Sites were instructed to perform an antibody screen with and without DTT-treated RBCs and to use a DTT-treated RBC panel for antibody identification. Qualitative data about the DTT method were collected by online survey. The primary outcome was the proportion of study sites able to identify the antibody unknown in the presence of DARA. RESULTSAll sites observed the DARA interference with the antibody screen. The DARA interference was seen with all testing methods (gel, tube, or solid phase). Using the DTT method, 25 of 25 sites (100%) successfully identified the antibody unknown in the presence of DARA. Feedback on the DTT method was positive, with 17 of 19 (90%) sites responding to the survey indicating that they planned to use the DTT method to test clinical samples from DARA-treated patients. CONCLUSIONThe DTT method is robust and reproducible and can be implemented by transfusion services worldwide to help provide safe blood products to patients treated with DARA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available