4.7 Review

Analytical strategies to the determination of metal-containing nanoparticles in environmental waters

Journal

TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 84, Issue -, Pages 107-120

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2016.03.026

Keywords

Metal-containing nanoparticles analysis; Determination; Characterization; Separation; Environmental waters; Analytical method validation; Nanoparticle reference materials

Funding

  1. German Federal Environmental Foundation (Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt, DBU) [20012/228]
  2. German Federal Environmental Foundation (Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt, DBU) [20012/228]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metal-containing nanoparticles (MNPs) represent emerging pollutants that still pose analytical challenges for their determination in environmentally relevant samples, including extremely low MNPs' concentrations, high colloidal background and the need to perform speciation analysis. Complementary to traditional state-of-the-art techniques evaluated elsewhere, this review additionally evaluates less conventional approaches for sample pretreatment, preconcentration, on- and offline detection, size characterisation and quantification of MNPs in environmental samples. Preconcentration techniques, like cloud point extraction and solid phase extraction, provide high preconcentration factors and recoveries. Electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry opens interesting perspectives in the still unresolved distinction between dissolved ions and nanoparticles. Combination of single particle ICP-MS with size fractionation techniques, like hydrodynamic chromatography or electrospray-differential mobility analysis, is highly promising for assessment of shape and structure related information of MNPs and their aggregates. Although highly relevant, the validation and production of reference materials and quantitative criteria on measurement certainty still require further development. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available