4.5 Article

Quantitative profiling of the in vivo enzymatic activity of ricin reveals disparate depurination of different pulmonary cell types

Journal

TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 258, Issue -, Pages 11-19

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2016.06.003

Keywords

Ricin; Abrin; Depurination; 28SrRNA; Lung

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The plant-derived toxins ricin and abrin, operate by site-specific depurination of ribosomes, which in turn leads to protein synthesis arrest. The clinical manifestation following pulmonary exposure to these toxins is that of a severe lung inflammation and respiratory insufficiency. Deciphering the pathways mediating between the catalytic activity and the developing lung inflammation, requires a quantitative appreciation of the catalytic activity of the toxins, in-vivo. In the present study, we monitored truncated cDNA molecules which are formed by reverse transcription when a depurinated 28S rRNA serves as template. We found that maximal depurination after intranasal exposure of mice to 2LD(50) ricin was reached 48 h, where nearly 40% of the ribosomes have been depurinated and that depurination can be halted by post-exposure administration of anti-ricin antibodies. We next demonstrated that the effect of ricin intoxication on different cell types populating the lungs differs greatly, and that outstandingly high levels of damage (80% depurination), were observed in particular for pulmonary epithelial cells. Finally, we found that the magnitude of depurination induced by the related plant-derived toxin abrin, was significantly lower in comparison to ricin, and can be attributed mostly to reduced depurination of pulmonary epithelial cells by abrin. This study provides for the first time vital information regarding the scope and timing of the catalytic performance of ricin and abrin in the lungs of intact animals. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available