4.6 Review

Role of platelets in cancer and cancer-associated thrombosis: Experimental and clinical evidences

Journal

THROMBOSIS RESEARCH
Volume 139, Issue -, Pages 65-76

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.01.006

Keywords

Platelet; Cancer; Immunothrombosis; Experimental models; Clinical investigations

Funding

  1. GFTC (Groupe Francophone Thrombose et Cancer) [2013_217]
  2. ARC (Agence pour la Recherche sur le Cancer) [SFI20111204031]
  3. FRM (Fondation de la Recherche Medicale) [DPC20111122984]
  4. INSERM
  5. Aix-Marseille University
  6. ANR (Agence Nationale pour la Recherche) [ANR-09-JCJC-0053]
  7. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-09-JCJC-0053] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The primary hemostatic function of platelets has been recognized for more than a century, but increasing experimental and clinical evidences suggest that platelets are also important mediators of cancer. Cancer indeed influences platelet physiology, and activated platelets participate in each step of cancer development by promoting tumor growth, angiogenesis, metastasis, and cancer-associated thrombosis. Based on both the results of numerous experimental models addressing the involvement of platelets in cancer progression and the results of epidemiologic studies on the use of anti-platelet drugs to prevent cancer, platelets have been proposed as a potential target to reduce the short-term risk of cancer, cancer dissemination and cancer mortality. However, the cancer-associated thrombosis and the risk of bleeding due to anti-platelet drugs are not enough evaluated in experimental models. Therefore, the interesting contribution of platelets to cancer and cancer-associated thrombosis requires the standardization of preclinical and clinical models. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available