4.2 Article

German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A: Structure, Results, and Future Perspectives

Journal

THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON
Volume 65, Issue 2, Pages 77-84

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1572436

Keywords

aorta/aortic; outcomes (includes mortality, morbidity); surgery; complications

Funding

  1. German Society of Thoracic, Cardiac and Vascular Surgery (GSTCVS)
  2. St. Jude Medical
  3. Medtronic
  4. Vascutek
  5. Edwards and the Medicines Company
  6. EACTS Young Investigator Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A (GERAADA) as an international registry for acute aortic dissection type A (AADA) offers a unique opportunity to answer questions regarding acute dissections that cannot be answered by single institution's database alone. GERAADA was started in 2006 by the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (GSTCVS) and has collected more than 3,300 AADA patients' data from 56 centers in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland up to now. In the second generated validated dataset comprising the years from 2006 to 2010, 2,137 patients were surgically treated for AADA with an overall 30-day mortality of 16.9%, and a new postoperative neurologic dysfunction of 9.5%. Risk factors for neurologic dysfunction were malperfusion syndromes, dissections of the supra-aortic vessels, and longer operating time. Neuroprotective drugs had no influence on stroke rates. Hypothermic circulatory arrest and antegrade selective cerebral perfusion (ACP) led to similar results if arrest times were less than 30 minutes while ACP for longer arrest periods is advisable. Septuagenarians had an early mortality rate (15.8%) similar to the whole cohort's, but the mortality rate in octogenarians (34.9%) was much higher. GERAADA with its validated 2,137 patient files (2006-2010) is the largest database on AADA worldwide and continues to collect data. Structured follow-up of more than 5 years will be available in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available