4.7 Article

Numerically and experimentally predicted knockdown factors for stiffened shells under axial compression

Journal

THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES
Volume 109, Issue -, Pages 13-24

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2016.09.008

Keywords

Stiffened cylindrical shell; Imperfection sensitivity; Knockdown factor (KDF); Buckling test

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2014CB049000, 2014CB046506]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11372062, 11402049, 91216201, 11128205]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M551070, 2015T80246]
  4. LNET Program [LJQ2013005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stiffened shells in launch vehicles are very sensitive to various forms of imperfections. In this study, the imperfection sensitivity of a 4.5 m diam isogrid stiffened shell under axial compression is investigated. The measured imperfection, NASA SP-8007 and several types of assumed imperfections, including eigenmode-shape imperfection and dimple-shape imperfections (produced by the single perturbation load approach (SPLA) and worst multiple perturbation load approach (WMPLA)), are introduced into FE model to predict the knockdown factors (KDFs), respectively. Then, the buckling test of this full-scale stiffened shell under axial compression is carried out to validate the above numerical approaches. It can be found that the KDF predicted by the WMPLA is very close to the test results, while the ones predicted by eigenmode-shape imperfection and NASA SP-8007 are extremely conservative. Besides, the measured imperfection and other assumed imperfections are proven to be risky, because these methods overestimate the actual load-carrying capacity. Finally, it can be concluded that the WMPLA is a potential and efficient approach to predict KDFs in the design stages for future launch vehicles. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available