4.4 Article

Growth and morphology control of β-Ga2O3 nanostructures by atmospheric-pressure CVD

Journal

THIN SOLID FILMS
Volume 620, Issue -, Pages 23-29

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2016.07.074

Keywords

beta-Ga2O3; Au; Atmospheric-pressure CVD; Nanowires; VLS growth; VS growth; Photoluminescence

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [26390029]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26390029] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Growth experiments of monoclinic gallium oxide (beta-Ga2O3) nanostructures were performed by the atmospheric-pressure CVD using metal gallium (Ga) beads and water (H2O) as source materials and a Au film as a catalyst in terms of substrate materials, Au film thickness, growth temperature and growth time. Local structure analysis based on transmission electron microscope (TEM) observations and selective area electron diffraction (SAED) measurements revealed the successful growth of single crystalline beta-Ga2O3 nanowires (NWs) through vapor-liquid-solid (VLS) growth mechanism. The average diameter of the NWs was changed in the range from similar to 60 to similar to 1500 nm under the growth conditions picked up in this paper. The critical temperature for the VLS growth using the 30 nm-thick Au catalytic film was experimentally estimated to be similar to 789 degrees C. The diversity of shapes of nanostructures was probably due to the temperature evolution of Au catalytic particle size, the film growth on the NW sides by vapor-solid (VS) growth mechanism, and the epitaxial relation between the substrate and the individual NW. The photoluminescence intensity of the blue band emission at similar to 490 nm relative to that of the ultraviolet band emission at similar to 360 nm became larger with increasing average diameter, suggesting the increase in the native defects formed near the surface region. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available