4.4 Article

Investigating the self-healing behaviour of under-aged and 60Sn-40Pb alloy reinforced aluminium hybrid composites

Journal

THIN SOLID FILMS
Volume 620, Issue -, Pages 201-205

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2016.08.071

Keywords

Aluminium hybrid; Self-healing; Bamboo leaf; Charpy impact test

Funding

  1. Botswana International University of Science and Technology, Palapye
  2. University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An experimental investigation was carried out to assess the self-healing characteristics of aluminium hybrid composites reinforced primarily with mixed proportion of silica sand and bamboo leaf ash. Charpy impact test samples with 45 degrees notch were machined from the aluminium hybrid composites and a.1 mm hole was drilled at 1 mm away from the notch. Two different self-healing treatments were given to the test samples prepared fromthe composites. In the first treatment, a 3mmdiameter hole was drilled along the sample and a lowmelting point alloy (60Sn-40Pb) which served as secondary reinforcing material was pierced into the hole and then heat treated at a temperature of 250 degrees C. The second treatment that was adopted involved subjecting the test samples to two-steps under-ageing treatment. The first step involved ageing at 160 degrees C for 15 min and quenched inwater. Thereafter, the second ageing treatment was carried out at 50 degrees C for 24 h. The samples were then subjected to Charpy impact testing. The results show that the composites had lower absorbed energy compared with Al-Mg-Si alloy. Self-healing treatment improved the energy absorbed in healed samples when compared to the damaged samples. Although, the under-aged samples had a slightly higher absorbed energy in comparison with the samples containing 60Sn-40Pb, the presence of silica sand and bamboo leaf ash did not have significant influence on the absorbed energy. The highest healing efficiency obtained using the low melting point alloy approach was 61%. (C) 2016 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available