4.6 Article

Coculture with good-quality COCs enhances the maturation and development rates of poor-quality COCs

Journal

THERIOGENOLOGY
Volume 85, Issue 3, Pages 396-407

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.09.001

Keywords

Coculture; IVM; Nuclear maturation; Cytoplasmic maturation; Embryo development

Funding

  1. BioGreen 21 Program of the Rural Development Administration [PJ01119601]
  2. Bio-industry Technology Development Program of the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Republic of Korea [IPET312060-5]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In pigs, more than half of the recovered cumulus cell-oocyte complexes (COCs) have one or two layers of cumulus cells and are considered morphologically poor. If we could take full advantage of these poor-quality COCs, we could potentially improve the efficiency of in vitro embryo production. During IVM, although some maturation factors are transmitted bidirectionally between the oocyte and the cumulus cells of the same COC, transmission also occurs between different COCs. We hypothesized that morphologically poor COCs fail to undergo complete oocyte maturation because of their insufficient secretion of maturation factors. Here, we investigated whether coculture with morphologically good COCs (having three or more layers of cumulus cells) could improve the maturation and utilization rates of morphologically poor COCs. Our results revealed that the oocyte maturation rate, glutathione level, embryo development capacity, blastocyst quality, and cumulus cell gene expression levels of BCL-2 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen were similar in the coculture and good-quality groups and that these levels were all significantly higher than those in the poor-quality group. Our results strongly suggest that the coculture strategy greatly improved the utilization rate of morphologically poor COCs without reducing their capacity for maturation and subsequent development. (c) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available