4.5 Article

Performance comparison of three predictor selection methods for statistical downscaling of daily precipitation

Journal

THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY
Volume 131, Issue 1-2, Pages 43-54

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00704-016-1956-x

Keywords

Predictor selection methods; Statistical downscaling; Uncertainty assessment; Ann

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41190084]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB03030204]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Predictor selection is a critical factor affecting the statistical downscaling of daily precipitation. This study provides a general comparison between uncertainties in downscaled results from three commonly used predictor selection methods (correlation analysis, partial correlation analysis, and stepwise regression analysis). Uncertainty is analyzed by comparing statistical indices, including the mean, variance, and the distribution of monthly mean daily precipitation, wet spell length, and the number of wet days. The downscaled results are produced by the artificial neural network (ANN) statistical downscaling model and 50 years (1961-2010) of observed daily precipitation together with reanalysis predictors. Although results show little difference between downscaling methods, stepwise regression analysis is generally the best method for selecting predictors for the ANN statistical downscaling model of daily precipitation, followed by partial correlation analysis and then correlation analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available