4.6 Article

Bistatic measurements for the estimation of rice crop variables using artificial neural network

Journal

ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH
Volume 55, Issue 6, Pages 1613-1623

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2015.01.003

Keywords

Rice crop; Crop variables; X-band; Scattering coefficient; Feed forward back propagation artificial neural network

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An outdoor rice crop bed (4 x 4 m(2)) was specially prepared for a bistatic ground based scatterometer measurements at various growth stages of rice crop from transplanting to ripening stage at like polarizations (HH- and VV-) in the angular range of 20-70 degrees at the steps of 5 degrees. The computed scattering coefficients showed increasing behavior from transplanting to reproductive stage and started decreasing at ripening stage. The angular dependency of scattering coefficient was found to decrease initially with age and became negligible near the ripening stage of rice crop. The polynomial regression analysis showed higher values of coefficient of determination (R-2) at 30 degrees incidence angle for both like polarizations. Two types of feed forward back propagation neural network (FFBPNN) models were developed for the estimation of rice crop growth variables namely FFBPANN-I and FFBPANN-II model. The FFBPANN-I model was developed with one input neuron (HH- or VV-polarized scattering coefficient) and one output neuron (biomass or leaf area index or plant height or chlorophyll content) while the FFBPANN-II model was developed with two input neurons (HH- and VV-polarized scattering coefficient) and four output neurons (biomass, leaf area index, plant height and chlorophyll content). Performances of both the types of FFBPANN models were found good for the estimation of rice crop variables. However, the performance of FFBPANN-II model was found better in comparison to the FFBPANN-I model at suitable incidence angle 30 degrees. (C) 2015 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available