4.5 Article

Involvement of nitric oxide in serotonin-induced scratching in mice

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages 647-652

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ced.12605

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Serotonin is a pruritogenic substance in humans and animals, but the mechanisms of action through which serotonin induces itch response are not yet understood. Aim. To examine the possible role of nitric oxide (NO) in the profile of scratching behaviour due to intradermal injection of serotonin in mice. Methods. Intradermal injection of serotonin (14.1-235nmol per site) into the nape of the neck was used to elicit itch in mice. Scratching behaviour was evaluated by counting the number of bouts during 60min after injection. To determine the possible involvement of the nitrergic system in serotonin-induced scratching, L-NG-nitroarginine methyl ester [L-NAME; a nonselective nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor], aminoguanidine [a selective inducible (i)NOS inhibitor] and L-arginine (an NO precursor) were administered intraperitoneally to control and serotonin-injected animals. Results. Intradermal serotonin caused scratching in mice with a bell-shaped dose-response correlation, and the peak effective dose was 141nmol per site. The majority of scratching bouts in animals occurred 5-10min after injection. Ineffective doses of L-NAME (3mg/kg IP) and aminoguanidine (100mg/kg IP) decreased the scratching induced by intradermal serotonin injection in animals (P<0.001 and P<0.001), while an subeffective dose of L-arginine (100mg/kg IP) augmented the scratching effect of serotonin (P<0.001). Conclusions. We show for the first time that the scratching induced by intradermal serotonin is mediated by NOS, especially iNOS, activation. We conclude that NO may play a role in mediating itch responses. NO and NOS could be new targets for antipruritic agents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available