4.5 Review

A review of the arcuate structures in the Iberian Variscides; constraints and genetic models

Journal

TECTONOPHYSICS
Volume 681, Issue -, Pages 170-194

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2016.04.011

Keywords

Oroclines; lbero-Armorican Arc; Cantabrian Arc; Variscan Iberia; Central Iberian Zone

Funding

  1. Institute of Earth Sciences (ICT)
  2. FCT (the Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation) [UID/GEO/04683/2013]
  3. Fundacao Calouste Gulbenkian
  4. FCT [SFRH/BD/80580/2011]
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/80580/2011] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the Iberian Variscides several first order arcuate structures have been considered. In spite of being highly studied their characterization, formation mechanisms and even existence is still debatable. The main Ibero-Armorican Arc (IAA) is essentially defined by a predominant NW-SE trend in the Iberian branch and an E-W trend in the Brittany one. However, in northern Spain it presents a 180 degrees rotation, sometimes known as the Cantabrian Arc (CA). The relation between both arcs is controversial, being considered either as a single arc due to one tectonic event, or as the result of a polyphasic process. According to the last assumption, there is a later arcuate structure (CA), overlapping a previous major one (IAA). Whatever the models, they must be able to explain the presence of a Variscan sinistral transpression in Iberia and a dextral one in Armorica, and a deformation spanning from the Devonian to the Upper Carboniferous. Another arcuate structure, in continuity with the CA, the Central-Iberian Arc (CIA) was recently proposed mainly based upon on magnetic anomalies, geometry of major folds and Ordovician paleocurrents. The critical review of the structural, stratigraphic and geophysical data supports both the IAA and the CA, but as independent structures. However, the presence of a CIA is highly questionable and could not be supported. The complex strain pattern of the IAA and the CA could be explained by a Devonian - Carboniferous polyphasic indentation of a Gondwana promontory. In this model the CA is essentially a thin-skinned arc, while the IAA has a more complex and longer evolution that has led to a thick-skinned first order structure. Nevertheless, both arcs are essentially the result of a lithospheric bending process during the Iberian Variscides. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available