4.7 Article

Comparison of the solid-phase extraction efficiency of a bounded and an included cyclodextrin-silica microporous composite for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons determination in water samples

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 156, Issue -, Pages 95-103

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2016.05.011

Keywords

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Solid phase extraction; Cyclodextrin-silica bounding; Water; Preconcentration

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [MAT2009-14564-C04-04, MAT2012-38429-C04-03]
  2. Generalitat Valenciana [PROMETEO/2009/108]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Solid-phase extraction is one of the most important techniques for sample purification and concentration. A wide variety of solid phases have been used for sample preparation over time. In this work, the efficiency of a new kind of solid-phase extraction adsorbent, which is a microporous material made from modified cyclodextrin bounded to a silica network, is evaluated through an analytical method which combines solid-phase extraction with high-performance liquid chromatography to determine polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water samples. Several parameters that affected the analytes recovery, such as the amount of solid phase, the nature and volume of the eluent or the sample volume and concentration influence have been evaluated. The experimental results indicate that the material possesses adsorption ability to the tested polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Under the optimum conditions, the quantification limits of the method were in the range of 0.09-2.4 mu g L-1 and fine linear correlations between peak height and concentration were found around 1.3-70 mu g L-1. The method has good repeatability and reproducibility, with coefficients of variation under 8%. Due to the concentration results, this material may represent an alternative for trace analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water trough solid phase extraction. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available