4.7 Article

Hydrogen-bond interaction assisted branched copolymer HILIC material for separation and N-glycopeptides enrichment

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 158, Issue -, Pages 361-367

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2016.05.034

Keywords

Hydrophilic interaction chromatography; Glycopeptide; Branched copolymer; Grafting from; Hydrogen-Bond Interaction

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21235005, 91543201]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB910601, 2013CB911200]
  3. Creative Research Group Project by NSFC [21321064]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) has attracted increasing attention in recent years due to its efficient application in the separation of polar compounds and the enrichment of glycopeptides. However, HILIC materials are still of weak hydrophilicity and thereby present weak retention and selectivity. In this work, branched copolymer modified hydrophilic material Sil@Poly(THMA-co-MBAAm), with high hydrophilicity and unique claw-like polyhydric groups, were prepared by grafting from thiol-ene click reaction. Due to the abundant functional groups provided by branched copolymer, the material showed excellent retention for nucleosides, necleobases, acidic compounds, sugars and peptides. Furthermore, Sil@Poly(THMA-co-MBAAm) was also applied for the N-glycosylation sites profiling towards the digests of the mouse brain, and 1997N-glycosylated peptides were identified, corresponding to 686 glycoprotein groups. Due to the assisted hydrogen-bond interaction, the selectivity for glycopeptide enrichment in the real sample reached 94.6%, which was the highest as far as we know. All these results indicated that such hydrogen-bond interaction assisted branched copolymer HILIC material possessed great potential for the separation and large scale glycoproteomics analysis. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available