4.7 Article

Carbon nanotube sponges as a solid-phase extraction adsorbent for the enrichment and determination of polychlorinated biphenyls at trace levels in environmental water samples

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 160, Issue -, Pages 79-85

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2016.07.005

Keywords

Carbon nanotube sponges; Solid-phase extraction; Polychlorinated biphenyls; Gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21477068]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2015YL003]
  3. Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province [2015GSF117011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon nanotube (CNT) sponges has recently attracted considerable attention in numerous fields because of its excellent properties, such as high porosity, light weight, and large surface area. The potential of CNT sponges for the solid-phase extraction (SPE) of organic pollutants at trace levels was investigated in this study for the first time. Seven polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were selected as analytes, and gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was employed for the detection. We optimized important parameters that may influence the efficiency of SPE, including the kind and volume of elution solvent, sample pH, and sample flow rate and volume. Under optimized conditions, low limits of detection (0.72-1.98 ng L-1), wide range of linearity (10-1000 ng L-1) and good repeatability (2.69-6.85%, n=5) were obtained. CNT sponges exhibited higher extraction performance than other adsorbent materials under the optimized conditions. Real environmental water samples were analyzed, and satisfactory recoveries (81.1-119.1%) were achieved. All these results demonstrated that CNT sponges are suitable SPE material for the enrichment and sensitive determination of PCBs at trace levels. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available