Journal
SYNTHESE
Volume 196, Issue 2, Pages 611-631Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-016-1118-9
Keywords
Bird; Newton; Scientific knowledge; Scientific progress; Scientific realism
Categories
Funding
- AHRC Realism and the Quantum project
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The epistemic conception of scientific progress equates progress with accumulation of scientific knowledge. I argue that the epistemic conception fails to fully capture scientific progress: theoretical progress, in particular, can transcend scientific knowledge in important ways. Sometimes theoretical progress can be a matter of new theories latching better onto unobservable reality' in a way that need not be a matter of new knowledge. Recognising this further dimension of theoretical progress is particularly significant for understanding scientific realism, since realism is naturally construed as the claim that science makes theoretical progress. Some prominent realist positions (regarding fundamental physics, in particular) are best understood in terms of commitment to theoretical progress that cannot be equated with accumulation of scientific knowledge.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available