4.7 Article

Human responses to social-ecological traps

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages 877-889

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s11625-016-0397-x

Keywords

Social-ecological traps; Sociology; Responses; Typology; Primary production; Rural development

Funding

  1. FORMAS Project Grant [2013-1293]
  2. European Research Council [283950]
  3. Swedish International Development Agency (Sida) through the Swedish Research Council [VR 2014-3394]
  4. Stockholm Resilience Centre
  5. Nordforsk
  6. Nordic Centre for Research on Marine Ecosystems and Resources under Climate Change (NorMER)
  7. Norden Top-level Research Initiative sub-programme 'Effect Studies and Adaptation to Climate Change'
  8. European Research Council (ERC) [283950] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Social-ecological (SE) traps refer to persistent mismatches between the responses of people, or organisms, and their social and ecological conditions that are undesirable from a sustainability perspective. Until now, the occurrence of SE traps is primarily explained from a lack of adaptive capacity; not much attention is paid to other causal factors. In our article, we address this concern by theorizing the variety of human responses to SE traps and the effect of these responses on trap dynamics. Besides (adaptive) capacities, we theorize desires, abilities and opportunities as important additional drivers to explain the diversity of human responses to traps. Using these theoretical concepts, we construct a typology of human responses to SE traps, and illustrate its empirical relevance with three cases of SE traps: Swedish Baltic Sea fishery; amaXhosa rural livelihoods; and Pamir smallholder farming. We conclude with a discussion of how attention to the diversity in human response to SE traps may inform future academic research and planned interventions to prevent or dissolve SE traps.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available