4.4 Article

Lower-extremity lymphedema following management for endometrial and cervical cancer

Journal

SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 200-204

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2016.05.015

Keywords

Lymphedema; Lymphadenectomy; Gynecologic surgery; Endometrial cancer; Cervical cancer

Funding

  1. Nancy Yeary Women's Cancer Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Despite the alleged benefits conferred by a lymphadenectomy in the management of gynecologic malignancies, there are concerns regarding the development of postoperative lower-extremity lymphedema. The purpose of this study was to identify the incidence of lymphedema and associated risk factors in accordance with surgical staging during the management of endometrial and cervical cancer. Method: We conducted a 5-year review of all endometrial and cervical cancer patients who underwent a lymphadenectomy. The subjects' demographics, medical co-morbidities, diagnosis, surgical treatment, inclusion of adjuvant radiotherapy and incidence of lower-extremity lymphedema were noted. Results: We identified 165 (135 endometrial cancer and 30 cervical cancer) subjects. Positive pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes were present in 21 (12.7%) and 10 patients (6.1%), respectively. In the entire population, 6 (3.6% incidence) subjects developed post-operative lymphedema. Supplementary analyses revealed that a BMI > 35 kg/m(2) and possessing numerous (>= 3) co-morbidities significantly correlated with the manifestation of lower-extremity lymphedema. Conclusion: In the current investigation, we observed a reasonably low, overall incidence of postoperative lower-extremity lymphedema. Nevertheless, when evaluating the potential for lymphedema in patients for whom a lymphadenectomy is indicated, specific risk factors should be considered in an effort to attenuate the development of this morbid condition. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available