4.3 Article

Prognostic indicators based on inflammatory and nutritional factors after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer

Journal

SURGERY TODAY
Volume 46, Issue 11, Pages 1258-1267

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00595-016-1308-6

Keywords

Pancreatic cancer; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Prognostic indicator

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We evaluated prognostic indicators based on inflammatory and nutritional factors, namely, the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and the platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), to determine their efficiency and significance after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. The subjects of this study were 46 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer between October 2007 and December 2014. Patients were divided into preoperative mGPS (0/1 and 2), PNI (< 40 and aeyen40), NLR (< 2.5 and aeyen2.5), and PLR (< 200 and aeyen200) groups, to evaluate various perioperative outcomes. Hemoglobin concentrations were significantly lower (P = 0.019), whereas intra-abdominal bleeding was significantly higher (P = 0.040) in the PNI (< 40) group than in the PNI (aeyen40) group. The incidence of postoperative pneumonia was significantly higher in the mGPS (2) group (P = 0.009), and surgical complications greater than grade 3 (Clavien-Dindo classification) were significantly increased in the NLR (aeyen2.5) group (P = 0.041). Overall survival rates in the PNI (< 40) (P = 0.019), NLR (aeyen2.5) (P = 0.001), and PLR (aeyen200) (P < 0.001) groups were significantly lower than those in the other groups. The PLR was the only independent prognostic indicator (P = 0.002) according to multivariate analysis. The mGPS, PNI, and NLR were effective predictive indicators of postoperative complications. The PLR was the most useful prognostic indicator for pancreatic cancer patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available