4.3 Review

The survival outcome and prognostic factors for distal cholangiocarcinoma following surgical resection: a meta-analysis for the 5-year survival

Journal

SURGERY TODAY
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages 271-279

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00595-016-1362-0

Keywords

Distal cholangiocarcinoma; Meta-analysis; Prognostic factors

Categories

Funding

  1. German Research Council (DFG) [WE5085/1-1]
  2. Scientific Research Fund from Hubei University of Chinese Medicine
  3. Education Project of Medical Talents for Young and Middle-aged in Wuhan City [Q2014037]
  4. Young Talents Project of Science and Technology Research Program from Hubei Provincial Department of Education [Q20132003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To assess the available evidence on the prognostic factors for the 5-year survival for patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) following surgical resection. We performed a comprehensive search of abstracts included in databases where relevant studies were published between January 2000 and August 2015. Risk ratios (RRs), 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs), and random-effects model were calculated using RevMan 5.3 software. A total of 23 observational studies involving 2063 patients with DCC were analyzed. The meta-analysis showed that postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy was not confirmed as a prognostic factor, with similar 5-year survival rates between those receiving and not receiving chemotherapy (RR 0.71; 95 % CI 0.21-2.36; P = 0.57). Perineural invasion (RR 0.51; 95 % CI 0.40-0.64; P < 0.00001), lymph node metastasis (RR 0.51; 95 % CI 0.38-0.70; P < 0.0001), positive resection margin status (RR 2.11; 95 % CI 1.36-3.30; P = 0.001), and not-well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (RR 1.77; 95 % CI 1.39-2.25; P < 0.00001) were associated with shorter survival. Perineural invasion, lymph node metastasis, resection margin status, and tumor differentiation were the significant prognostic factors for the 5-year survival.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available