4.7 Article

Detection of IgG anti-Domain I beta2 Glycoprotein I antibodies by chemiluminescence immunoassay in primary antiphospholipid syndrome

Journal

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 446, Issue -, Pages 201-205

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2015.04.033

Keywords

Anti-beta 2 Glycoprotein I antibodies; Anticardiolipin antibodies; Anti-Domain I antibodies; Antiphospholipid syndrome; Chemiluminescence immunoassay

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: IgG anti-Domain I (anti-DI) beta 2 Glycoprotein I (beta 2GPI) antibodies are associated to thrombotic risk in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), but their detection is technically difficult. In this study, a chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) was used to evaluate the clinical significance of IgG anti-DI in a large cohort of patients with primary APS (PAPS). Methods: The study population included 88 patients with PAPS, 63 ELISA-negative subjects and 166 controls. IgG anti-DI, IgG anticardiolipin (aCL) and IgG anti-beta 2GPI antibodies were assayed using CLIA (HemosIL AcuStar (R)). Results: The sensitivity and specificity of IgG anti-DI antibodies were comparable to those of IgG aCL and IgG anti-beta 2GPI antibodies. There was a significant agreement, association and titre correlation between IgG anti-DI and IgG aCL as well as IgG anti-beta 2GPI antibodies (p<0.001 for all). IgG anti-DI antibody showed lesser prevalence and mean titres in the pregnancy morbidity than in thrombotic and PAPS patients with both involvements (p<0.001). Regarding the conventional aPL antibody profiles, the triple positivity group had higher prevalence and mean titres than single and double positivity ones (p<0.001). Conclusions: This study provides further evidence that anti-DI antibodies can be considered a promising biomarker for risk assessment particularly in patients having vascular thrombosis and triple conventional aPL positivity. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available