4.4 Article

A DFT study of Ni clusters deposition on titania and zirconia (101) surfaces

Journal

SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 646, Issue -, Pages 230-238

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2015.04.004

Keywords

Oxide surfaces; Heterogeneous catalysis; Supported metal nanoparticles; Density functional calculations; Oxygen spillover

Funding

  1. European Community [604307]
  2. Italian MIUR through the FIRB Project [RBAP115AYN]
  3. COST Action [CM1104]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Density functional calculations are employed to simulate the deposition of an isolated Ni atom and a Nilo particle on the stoichiometric and reduced anatase TiO2 (101) and tetragonal ZrO2 (101) surfaces. The main purpose of this work is to study the modification of the electronic structure of the oxide induced by the metal, aiming at the understanding of the physical properties of new catalysts for biomass conversion. When the adsorption of a Ni atom takes place on stoichiometric surfaces, no major charge transfer is observed. On reduced titania, and more pronouncedly on reduced zirconia, the Ni atom is negatively charged, provided that the vacancy is in direct contact with the adsorbed metal atom. For Ni-10, on titania the bonding is dominated by the hybridization of the metal and the oxide states but we did not find evidence for a direct reduction of the oxide via formation of Ti3+ states. For Ni-10 on zirconia, the metal particle is positively charged on the stoichiometric surface and negatively charged on the reduced one but, again, there is no indication of a direct reduction of the oxide. Finally, the reverse oxygen spillover is considered as a possible route to reduce the oxide support. The result is that Ni-10 promotes oxygen spillover on titania almost spontaneously, while on zirconia this process is thermodynamically unfavourable. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available