4.7 Article

Evaluating mechanical properties and crack resistance of CrN, CrTiN, CrAlN and CrTiAlN coatings by nanoindentation and scratch tests

Journal

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 285, Issue -, Pages 203-213

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.11.040

Keywords

Cr-Ti-Al-N; Topic: Nanoindentation; Crack; Residual stress; Fracture toughness.

Funding

  1. Keio Leading-edge Laboratory of Science and Technology (KLL) in Keio University
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51375231]
  3. Research Fund for Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20133218110030]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CrN, CrTiN, CrAlN and CrTiAlN coatings were deposited on Si (100) wafers, and their microstructure, mechanical properties, fracture toughness and adhesive strength were investigated via X-ray diffraction (XRD), nanoindentation and micro-scratch tests. Besides an F.C.C. crystal structure, TiN0.3 (004) and AlN (222) phases were found in the CrTiN and CrAlN coatings while the crystallinity of the CrTiAlN coating decreased. The hardness of the CrN (14.5 GPa), CrTiN (13.9 GPa) and CrAlN (17.7 GPa) coatings was determined by their grain sizes while the CrTiAlN coating with the most compact morphology exhibited the highest hardness of 22.0 GPa. In addition, CrTiN (K-Ic = 2.73 MPa .root m), CrAlN (K-Ic = 2.70 MPa . root m) and CrTiAlN coatings showed a stronger crack resistance than the CrN coating (K-Ic = 1.06 MPa.root m, especially the CrTiAlN coating without any radial cracks. However, the CrTiAlN coating encountered circumferential cracks and premature delamination (Adhesive energy G(c) = 70 J/m(2)) because of its highest compressive stress (4.64 GPa). Based on the results here, it is concluded that a decent compressive stress of 3.0 GPa is expected to help thin films prevent from radial and circumferential cracks simultaneously. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available