4.7 Article

Influence of β-SiC on the microstructures and thermal properties of SiC coatings for C/C composites

Journal

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 304, Issue -, Pages 188-194

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.07.010

Keywords

Carbon/carbon composites; beta-SiC; SiC coating; Grain size; Oxidation resistance

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51272212, 51402238, 51472202]
  2. Research Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing (NWPU) of China [142-TZ-2016]
  3. 111 Project [B08040]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two kinds of SiC coatings were fabricated on C/C composites by a two-step pack cementation. The CS-SiC coating was prepared using Si, graphite and Al2O3 powder as the raw materials, while the raw materials of FCS-SiC coating were composed of Si, graphite, Al2O3 and beta-SiC powder. The morphology and phase composition of the coatings were characterized by scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction. The results showed that the FCS-SiC coating possessed a denser surface with smaller grain sizes. Meanwhile, some large open-holes and penetrating cracks could be found in the surface of the FCS-SiC coating. The oxidation and thermal properties of the coatings were investigated and compared. After oxidation at 1773 K for 43 h, the FCS-SiC and CS-SiC coating presented a weight-loss of 0.64% and a weight-gain of 0.44%, respectively. The FCS-SiC coating showed a weight-loss of 0.52% after 30 thermal cycles between 1773 K and room temperature, while the CS-SiC coating exhibited a weight-gain of 0.11% after 50 thermal cycles. The inferior protection ability of the FCS-SiC coating could be attributed to the severe defects. These severe defects were formed in the preparation process of the FCS-SiC coating, which might be ascribed to the effect of the beta-SiC additive. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available