4.6 Article

Quality of Working Life of cancer survivors: associations with health- and work-related variables

Journal

SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages 1475-1484

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3549-8

Keywords

Quality of Working Life; Cancer survivors; Return-to-work; Work continuation; Patient reported outcomes; Cancer survivorship

Funding

  1. Dutch Cancer Society [2011-5228]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose This study aimed to (1) describe the Quality of Working Life (QWL) of cancer survivors and (2) explore associations between the QWL of cancer survivors and health and work-related variables. Methods Employed and self-employed cancer survivors were recruited through hospitals and patient organizations. They completed the Quality of Working Life Questionnaire for Cancer Survivors (QWLQ-CS) and health- and work-related variables in this cross-sectional study. The QWL scores of cancer survivors were described, and associations between QWL and health- and work-related variables were assessed. Results The QWLQ-CS was completed by 302 cancer survivors (28% male) with a mean age of 52 +/- 8 years. They were diagnosed between 0 and 10 years ago with various types of cancer, such as breast cancers, gastrointestinal cancers, uro-logical cancers, and haematological cancers. The QWL mean score of cancer survivors was 75 +/- 12 (0-100). Cancer survivors had statistically significant lower QWL scores when they had been treated with chemotherapy or when they reported comorbidity (p <= 0.05). Cancer survivors without managerial positions, with low incomes or physically demanding work, and who worked a proportion of their contract hours had statistically significantly lower QWL scores (p <= 0.05). Conclusions This study described the QWL of cancer survivors and associations between QWL and health- and work-related variables. Based on these variables, it is possible to indicate groups of cancer survivors who need more attention and support regarding QWL and work continuation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available