Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Outcomes and endpoints in cancer trials: bridging the divide
Michelle K. Wilson et al.
LANCET ONCOLOGY (2015)
Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)
Amylou C. Dueck et al.
JAMA ONCOLOGY (2015)
Development of the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)
Ethan Basch et al.
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE (2014)
Cognitive interviewing of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)
Jennifer L. Hay et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2014)
Recommendations for Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes Into Clinical Comparative Effectiveness Research in Adult Oncology
Ethan Basch et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2012)
Electronic Toxicity Monitoring and Patient-Reported Outcomes
Ethan M. Basch et al.
CANCER JOURNAL (2011)
Content Validity-Establishing and Reporting the Evidence in Newly Developed Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Instruments for Medical Product Evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report: Part 2-Assessing Respondent Understanding
Donald L. Patrick et al.
VALUE IN HEALTH (2011)
A comprehensive method for the translation and cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaires
SL Eremenco et al.
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS (2005)
Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation
D Wild et al.
VALUE IN HEALTH (2005)
Development of three African language translations of the FACT-G
V Mullin et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2000)