4.2 Article

Out of the fog: Catalyzing integrative capacity in interdisciplinary research

Journal

STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Volume 56, Issue -, Pages 84-94

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2016.01.002

Keywords

Interdisciplinarity; Science of team science; Coastal fog; Integration; Integrative capacity

Funding

  1. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF) [3414, 4052]
  2. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch project [MICL02261]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Social studies of interdisciplinary science investigate how scientific collaborations approach complex challenges that require multiple disciplinary perspectives. In order for collaborators to meet these complex challenges, interdisciplinary collaborations must develop and maintain integrative capacity, understood as the ability to anticipate and weigh tradeoffs in the employment of different disciplinary approaches. Here we provide an account of how one group of interdisciplinary fog scientists intentionally catalyzed integrative capacity. Through conversation, collaborators negotiated their commitments regarding the ontology of fog systems and the methodologies appropriate to studying fog systems, thereby enhancing capabilities which we take to constitute integrative capacity. On the ontological front, collaborators negotiated their commitments by setting boundaries to and within the system, layering different subsystems, focusing on key intersections of these subsystems, and agreeing on goals that would direct further investigation. On the methodological front, collaborators sequenced various methods, anchored methods at different scales, validated one method with another, standardized the outputs of related methods, and coordinated methods to fit a common model. By observing the process and form of collaborator conversations, this case study demonstrates that social studies of science can bring into critical focus how interdisciplinary collaborators work toward an integrated conceptualization of study systems. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available