Journal
STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages 331-344Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2016.1158288
Keywords
Railways; life cycle assessment; geosynthetics; transition zone; rail maintenance; environmental impact
Categories
Funding
- EU FP7 program
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The railway infrastructure is a very important component of the world's total transportation network. Investment in its construction and maintenance is therefore significant on a global scale. Up to now, some results of the life-cycle assessment (LCA) of open railway line, as well as railway bridges and tunnels, have been published, but detailed analyses of transition zones have not so far been performed. In railway networks, transitional zones are a critical area where the transition from open rail to solid bridge construction can cause significant settlements. The goal of these analyses was to compare two different types of track renewal methods for railway transition zones. In the first method, traditional cement stabilisation is used, whereas the second solution makes use of a geocomposite anchored by steel anchors. The paper presents some results from an environmental study for railway transition zones based on the demonstration case. The results of the performed LCA showed that, in the case of track renewal for transition zones by means of a geocomposite and anchors, the environmental impact is lower than in the case when cement stabilisation works are performed. Less extensive excavation works and thus lower quantities of used material are additional benefits.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available