4.7 Article

A GF-discrepancy for point selection in stochastic seismic response analysis of structures with uncertain parameters

Journal

STRUCTURAL SAFETY
Volume 59, Issue -, Pages 20-31

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2015.11.001

Keywords

Multi-dimensional integral; Generalized F-discrepancy; Non-uniform distribution; Extended Koksma-Hlawka inequality; Stochastic response; Probability density evolution method

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [11172210, 51261120374]
  2. National R D Program [2011BAJ09B03-02]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering [SLDRCE14-B-17]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the stochastic dynamic analysis of nonlinear structures, the strategy of point selection plays a critical role in achieving the tradeoffs between the accuracy and efficiency. To this end, cooperated with the concept of the extended F-discrepancy (EF-discrepancy), the Koksma-Hlawka inequality, which bounds the worst error of cubature formulae, is extended to the cases involving non-uniform distributions in the present paper. Further, in order to avoid the computational complexity of EF-discrepancy, the Generalized F-discrepancy (GF-discrepancy) is introduced. In light of the quantitative equivalence between the EF-discrepancy and GF-discrepancy, the extended Koksma-Hlawka inequality could be modified by replacing the EF-discrepancy with the GF-discrepancy. Thereby the rationality of adopting GF-discrepancy as the objective function of point selection is theoretically supported. Thus, by reducing the GF-discrepancy, a new strategy of representative point set determination via rearrangement is proposed. The proposed approach is then applied to stochastic dynamical response analysis of strong nonlinear structures by incorporated into the probability density evolution method, showing its effectiveness for practical applications. Problems to be further studied are outlined. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available