4.7 Article

A state estimation method for wireless structural control systems

Journal

STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/stc.1929

Keywords

estimator switching method; wireless structural control; real-time hybrid simulation

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI 0927178, CNS 1035748, CNS 1035773]
  2. NSF [CNS 1028668]
  3. School of Mechanical Engineering at Purdue

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Structural control systems based on wireless sensors offer a convenient, flexible and cost-effective alternative to their wired counterparts. Although wireless control systems (WCSs) have several attractive features, some challenges do remain related to the persistent presence of network-induced time delays, and potential for sensor data losses and in extreme cases, sensor failures. The consequences of these challenges should be investigated, and solutions should be developed to achieve highly effective and robust control systems. The availability of such solutions will also encourage the adoption of WCSs in real structures. Here, an estimator switching method intended to minimize the influence of potential faults is developed and validated for WCSs. In this method, the switching gains are pre-calculated to enable real-time implementation. The proposed method is verified through numerical simulations of a seismically excited, three-story structure considering various sensor data loss and sensor failure scenarios. The robustness of this estimation method in the presence of measurement noise and modeling uncertainty is also investigated. In addition, the estimation switching method is incorporated into a closed-loop WCS in experiment. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed state estimation method in mitigating the impact of sensor data loss and sensor failure. Copyright (c) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available