4.5 Article

Regional modeling of large wildfires under current and potential future climates in Colorado and Wyoming, USA

Journal

CLIMATIC CHANGE
Volume 134, Issue 4, Pages 565-577

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-015-1553-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. USGS Invasive Species Program
  2. National Needs Fellowship program of National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture [2010-03280]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Regional analysis of large wildfire potential given climate change scenarios is crucial to understanding areas most at risk in the future, yet wildfire models are not often developed and tested at this spatial scale. We fit three historical climate suitability models for large wildfires (i.e. a parts per thousand yen 400 ha) in Colorado and Wyoming using topography and decadal climate averages corresponding to wildfire occurrence at the same temporal scale. The historical models classified points of known large wildfire occurrence with high accuracies. Using a novel approach in wildfire modeling, we applied the historical models to independent climate and wildfire datasets, and the resulting sensitivities were 0.75, 0.81, and 0.83 for Maxent, Generalized Linear, and Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines, respectively. We projected the historic models into future climate space using data from 15 global circulation models and two representative concentration pathway scenarios. Maps from these geospatial analyses can be used to evaluate the changing spatial distribution of climate suitability of large wildfires in these states. April relative humidity was the most important covariate in all models, providing insight to the climate space of large wildfires in this region. These methods incorporate monthly and seasonal climate averages at a spatial resolution relevant to land management (i.e. 1 km(2)) and provide a tool that can be modified for other regions of North America, or adapted for other parts of the world.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available