4.7 Article

Evaluation and potential improvements of WRF/CMAQ in simulating multi-levels air pollution in megacity Shanghai, China

Journal

STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT
Volume 31, Issue 10, Pages 2513-2526

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-016-1342-3

Keywords

Environmental modeling; Model evaluation; WRF; CMAQ; Pollution-meteorology interaction; Model uncertainty

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21677038]
  2. Science AMP
  3. Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [14ZR1402800, 15DZ1205404]
  4. National Key Technology RAMP
  5. D Program of Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2014BAC16B01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The accuracy of atmospheric numerical model is important for the prediction of urban air pollution. This study investigated and quantified the uncertainties of meteorological and air quality model during multi-levels air pollution periods. We simulated the air quality of megacity Shanghai, China with WRF/CMAQ (Weather Research and Forecasting model and Community Multiscale Air Quality model) at both non-pollution and heavy-pollution episodes in 2012. The weather prediction model failed to reproduce the surface temperature and wind speed in condition of high aerosol loading. The accuracy of the air quality model showed a clear dropping tendency from good air quality conditions to heavily polluted episodes. The absolute model bias increased significantly from light air pollution to heavy air pollution for SO2 (from 2 to 14%) and for PM10 (from 1 to 33%) in both urban and suburban sites, for CO in urban sites (from 8 to 48%) and for NO2 in suburban sites (from 1 to 58%). A test of applying the Urban Canopy Model scheme to the WRF model showed fairly good improvement on predicting the meteorology field, but less significant effect on the air pollutants (6% for SO2 and 19% for NO2 decease in model bias found only in urban sites). This study gave clear evidence to the sensitivities of the model performance on the air pollution levels. It is suggested to consider this impact as a source for model bias in the model assessment and make improvement in the model development in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available