Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Statistical efficiency and optimal design for stepped cluster studies under linear mixed effects models
Alan J. Girling et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2016)
Optimal stepped wedge designs
Jock Lawrie et al.
STATISTICS & PROBABILITY LETTERS (2015)
Logistic, ethical, and political dimensions of stepped wedge trials: critical review and case studies
Audrey Prost et al.
TRIALS (2015)
Five questions to consider before conducting a stepped wedge trial
James R. Hargreaves et al.
TRIALS (2015)
Designing a stepped wedge trial: three main designs, carry-over effects and randomisation approaches
Andrew J. Copas et al.
TRIALS (2015)
Analysis and reporting of stepped wedge randomised controlled trials: synthesis and critical appraisal of published studies, 2010 to 2014
Calum Davey et al.
TRIALS (2015)
Sample size calculation for a stepped wedge trial
Gianluca Baio et al.
TRIALS (2015)
Stepped wedge randomised controlled trials: systematic review of studies published between 2010 and 2014
Emma Beard et al.
TRIALS (2015)
Cluster randomised trials with repeated cross sections: alternatives to parallel group designs
Richard Hooper et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2015)
The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting
K. Hemming et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2015)
Cluster randomised trials with repeated cross sections: alternatives to parallel group designs
Richard Hooper et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2015)
The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting
K. Hemming et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2015)
Stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trials: a generic framework including parallel and multiple-level designs
Karla Hemming et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2015)
The dog-leg: an alternative to a cross-over design for pragmatic clinical trials in relatively stable populations
Richard Hooper et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2014)
The efficiency of stepped wedge vs. cluster randomized trials: Stepped wedge studies do not always require a smaller sample size
Karla Hemming et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2013)
The stepped wedge cluster randomized trial always requires fewer clusters but not always fewer measurements, that is, participants than a parallel cluster randomized trial in a cross-sectional design Reply
Esther de Hoop et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2013)
Stepped wedge designs could reduce the required sample size in cluster randomized trials
Willem Woertman et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2013)
Seven myths of randomisation in clinical trials
Stephen Senn
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2013)
Investigation of the effectiveness of the Girls on the Go! program for building self-esteem in young women: trial protocol
Loredana Tirlea et al.
SPRINGERPLUS (2013)
A simple sample size formula for analysis of covariance in cluster randomized trials
Steven Teerenstra et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2012)
Systematic review of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials shows that design is particularly used to evaluate interventions during routine implementation
Noreen D. Mdege et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2011)
Sample size calculation for cluster randomized cross-over trials
B. Giraudeau et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2008)
Design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials
Michael A. Hussey et al.
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS (2007)
Sample size for cluster randomized trials: effect of coefficient of variation of cluster size and analysis method
Sandra M. Eldridge et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2006)
Self-esteem as an outcome measure in studies of vocational rehabilitation for adults with severe mental illness
WC Torrey et al.
PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES (2000)