4.5 Article

Power/sample size calculations for assessing correlates of risk in clinical efficacy trials

Journal

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 35, Issue 21, Pages 3745-3759

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sim.6952

Keywords

case-cohort design; case-control design; immune response biomarkers; measurement error; principal stratification; two-phase sampling design; vaccine efficacy trial

Funding

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R37AI054165, UM1AI068635]
  2. US Military HIV Research Program (MHRP)
  3. US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command
  4. NIAID
  5. US and Thai Components, Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science
  6. Ministry of Public Health, Thailand
  7. Mahidol University
  8. SanofiPasteur
  9. Global Solutions for Infectious Diseases

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In a randomized controlled clinical trial that assesses treatment efficacy, a common objective is to assess the association of a measured biomarker response endpoint with the primary study endpoint in the active treatment group, using a case-cohort, case-control, or two-phase sampling design. Methods for power and sample size calculations for such biomarker association analyses typically do not account for the level of treatment efficacy, precluding interpretation of the biomarker association results in terms of biomarker effect modification of treatment efficacy, with detriment that the power calculations may tacitly and inadvertently assume that the treatment harms some study participants. We develop power and sample size methods accounting for this issue, and the methods also account for inter-individual variability of the biomarker that is not biologically relevant (e.g., due to technical measurement error). We focus on a binary study endpoint and on a biomarker subject to measurement error that is normally distributed or categorical with two or three levels. We illustrate the methods with preventive HIV vaccine efficacy trials and include an R package implementing the methods. Copyright (c) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available