4.6 Article

Assessing calibration of prognostic risk scores

Journal

STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 1692-1706

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0962280213497434

Keywords

calibration; Poisson; survival; Cox model; prognostic risk scores; standardized incidence ratio

Funding

  1. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [R01AR46849, R01 AR027065]
  2. National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health [R01AG034676]
  3. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) [UL1 TR000135]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current methods used to assess calibration are limited, particularly in the assessment of prognostic models. Methods for testing and visualizing calibration (e.g. the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration slope) have been well thought out in the binary regression setting. However, extension of these methods to Cox models is less well known and could be improved. We describe a model-based framework for the assessment of calibration in the binary setting that provides natural extensions to the survival data setting. We show that Poisson regression models can be used to easily assess calibration in prognostic models. In addition, we show that a calibration test suggested for use in survival data has poor performance. Finally, we apply these methods to the problem of external validation of a risk score developed for the general population when assessed in a special patient population (i.e. patients with particular comorbidities, such as rheumatoid arthritis).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available