4.6 Article

Reactivity and analytical performance of oxygen as cell gas in inductively coupled plasma tandem mass spectrometry

Journal

SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART B-ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY
Volume 126, Issue -, Pages 31-36

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2016.10.013

Keywords

Inductively coupled plasma; Tandem mass spectrometry; Oxygen reaction; Oxides

Categories

Funding

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2014/18393-1, 2013/26857-5]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [303107/2013-8]
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES) [15/2104]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The reactivity and analytical performance of O-2 as cell gas in inductively coupled plasma tandem mass spectrometry was investigated. Selected analytes in a wide-mass range were divided in three groups according to their reactivity: G1 represents elements with high oxygen affinity (Ce, La, P, Sc, Ti, and Y), G2 contains elements that may partially react with oxygen (As, Ba, Mo, Si, Sr, and V), and G3 comprises elements expected to be less reactive towards oxygen (Al, Bi, Cu, Mg, Pb, and Pd). On-mass and mass-shift modes were evaluated by monitoring atomic and metal oxide ions, respectively. Analytical signal profiles, oxide percentages, sensitivities and limits of detection for oxygen flow rates varying from 0.1 to 1.0 mL min(-1) were also studied. Group 1 elements plus As and V presented better sensitivities and LODs when measuring oxides, which were the major species for all flow rates evaluated. Molybdenum and Si oxides presented intermediate behavior and MoO fraction was up to 47% and limit of detection was the same as that obtained in on-mass mode. For others G2 and G3 elements, on-mass mode presented higher sensitivity and better LODs, with estimated oxide contents lower than 10%. In most cases, increasing oxygen flow rates led to lower sensitivities and worse LODs. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available