3.9 Article

Progressive Postnatal Pansynostosis

Journal

CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL
Volume 52, Issue 6, Pages 751-757

Publisher

ALLIANCE COMMUNICATIONS GROUP DIVISION ALLEN PRESS
DOI: 10.1597/14-092

Keywords

craniosynostosis; normocephalic; pansynostosis; postnatal; progressive

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To describe the subtle clinical features, genetic considerations, and management of progressive postnatal pansynostosis, a rare form of multisutural craniosynostosis that insidiously occurs after birth and causes inconspicuous cranial changes. Design, Participants, Setting: The study is a retrospective chart review of all patients diagnosed with progressive postnatal pansynostosis at a major craniofacial center between 2000 and 2009. Patients with kleebattschadel were excluded. Results: Nineteen patients fit our inclusion criteria. Fifteen patients had a syndromic diagnosis: Crouzon syndrome (n = 8), Saethre-Chotzen syndrome (n = 5), and Pfeiffer syndrome (n = 2). With the exception of one patient with moderate turricephaly, all patients had a relatively normal head shape with cranial indices ranging from 0.72 to 0.93 (mean, 0.81). Patients were diagnosed at an average of 32.4 months; craniosynostosis was suspected based on declining percentile head circumference (n = 14), detection of an apical prominence (n = 12), papilledema (n = 7), and worsening exorbitism (n = 3). Nearly all patients had evidence of increased intracranial pressure. Conclusion: Progressive postnatal pansynostosis is insidious; diagnosis is typically delayed because the clinical signs are subtle and appear gradually. All infants or children with known or suspected craniosynostotic disorder and a normal head shape should be carefully monitored; computed tomography is indicated if there is any decrease in percentile head circumference or symptoms of intracranial pressure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available