4.5 Article

Phylogenetic analyses of Searsia (Anacardiaceae) from eastern Asia and its biogeographic disjunction with its African relatives

Journal

SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
Volume 106, Issue -, Pages 129-136

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2016.05.021

Keywords

Anacardiaceae; Eastern Asia; Phylogeny; Biogeographic disjunction; Searsia; Southern Africa

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31570211]
  2. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  3. Laboratory of Analytical Biology of the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Searsia is an Old World genus in the sumac family Anacardiaceae segregated from the Rhus complex. The genus is widely distributed in Africa with three species in eastern Asia, of which Searsia paniculata was commonly recognized as Terminthia paniculata in China. In this study, we conducted phylogenetic analyses of the eastern Asian Searsia to test the relationships to the African relatives, based on both nuclear (ETS and ITS) and chloroplast (trnL-F and ndhF) sequences. Phylogenetic analyses based on different genomic sequences strongly support that the Searsia taxa from eastern Asia are monophyletic. However, topological incongruence is observed between the nuclear and chloroplast data, especially concerning the phylogenetic position of the eastern Asian group. The divergence time of the genus between eastern Asia and Africa was dated to 23.36 Ma (million years ago), with a 95% highest posterior density (HPD) of 14.30-36.31 Ma, using the Bayesian relaxed-clock estimation. It is hypothesized that the closure of the Tethys Sea and the formation of the Gomphotherium Landbridge likely had enabled the expansion of the Searsia lineage between Africa and Asia in the late Oligocene to early Miocene. (C) 2016 SAAB. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available