4.5 Article

Co doped ZnO nanowires as visible light photocatalysts

Journal

SOLID STATE SCIENCES
Volume 56, Issue -, Pages 54-62

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2016.04.008

Keywords

Zinc oxide; Doping; Nanowires; Photocatalyst; Chemical synthesis; Photoelectron spectroscopy

Funding

  1. Estonian Research Council [IUT2-25, PUT1096]
  2. National Research Program LATENERGI
  3. ERDF [3.2.1101.12-0027, 3.2.1101.12-0028, 3.2.1101.12-0010, TK114, TK117]
  4. Estonian Nanotechnology Competence Center [EU29996]
  5. European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) CALIPSO [312284]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High aspect ratio cobalt doped ZnO nanowires showing strong photocatalytic activity and moderate ferromagnetic behaviour were successfully synthesized using a solvothermal method and characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM) and UV-visible absorption spectroscopy. The photocatalytic activities evaluated for visible light driven degradation of an aqueous methylene orange (MO) solution were higher than for Co doped ZnO nanoparticles at the same doping level and synthesized by the same synthesis route. The rate constant for MO visible light photocatalytic degradation was 1.9.10(-3) min(-1) in case of nanoparticles and 4.2.10(-3) min(-1) in case of nanowires. We observe strongly enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity for moderate Co doping levels, with an optimum at a composition of Zn(0.9)5Co(0.05)O. The enhanced photocatalytic activities of Co doped ZnO nanowires were attributed to the combined effects of enhanced visible light absorption at the Co sites in ZnO nanowires, and improved separation efficiency of photogenerated charge carriers at optimal Co doping. (C) 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available