4.7 Article

The sapro-rhizosphere: Carbon flow from saprotrophic fungi into fungus-feeding bacteria

Journal

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 102, Issue -, Pages 14-17

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.06.014

Keywords

Fungal-bacterial interactions; Mycophagy; Root exudates; Rhizosphere; Sapro-rhizosphere; Food web interactions

Categories

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, division Earth and Life Sciences (NWO-ALW) [819.01.016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Root-derived, labile organic compounds are thought to enter the rhizosphere food web mainly via consumption by mycorrhizal fungi and bacteria. Studies tracking the fate of root derived carbon via stable isotope probing (SIP), however, indicate an important role for saprotrophic fungi as consumers of root exudates. In addition, it was shown that a diverse group of rhizosphere bacteria have the ability to withdraw carbon from saprotrophic fungal hyphae. Based on the fast carbon-flow into saprotrophic rhizosphere fungi and the wide-spread occurrence of rhizosphere bacteria with mycophagous abilities, we argue that the current concept of rhizosphere carbon flow should be revised to account for more complex microbial food web interactions. We propose to split the bacteria thriving in the rhizosphere niche into plant-feeders and fungus-feeders. The latter would include rhizosphere bacteria feeding on all functional groups of fungi, i.e. including mycorrhiza. To indicate the importance of saprotrophic fungi as a food source for rhizosphere bacteria, we introduce a new niche, the sapro-rhizosphere niche. We want to stimulate a discussion on rhizosphere carbon flow by challenging the established division into a mere bacterial- and fungal channel consisting, of primary consumers, and to point at research directions based on the sapro-rhizosphere concept. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available